Countdown to Halloween: October 12, 2011
Source: Netflix Instant Play
How often does the sequel turn out better than the first? Not often. But that’s definitely the case with Quarantine 2. I don’t think it’s necessarily because of the story, but I think it’s because of the way it was filmed. The first one was filmed Blair Witch style — from a handheld camera — and I think it worked. Journalists will do anything, including worrying about filming while people are dying, to get their story told. I don’t think that would have worked a second time, and I think the people who made this knew that, and filmed it traditionally. And I think that’s the main reason why this worked so well.
Granted, it has its faults. The ground crewman points out that different measures get taken since 9/11. He’s right. So how did one of the passengers manage to check a bag containing a firearm and a ton of ammo? TSA doesn’t allow that, even in checked baggage. I’m pretty sure if I went and looked at TSA regulations, animal carriers would need to meet a certain requirement, and the one shown in the movie certainly did not. But I digress. In general I think it worked very well. My boyfriend didn’t hate it, and that really says something. I definitely enjoyed this from start to finish. I’m also wondering about the possibility for a third. Not sure how all this would work a third time… I didn’t even have full confidence it would work this time. But, they surprised me, and it did. And for some reason, I think the plane/terminal setting was perfect. I couldn’t say exactly why, but it was.
The other reason why this was actually scary is because unlike the first movie, you get information. I can’t go too much into it without it being a spoiler, but what I will say is that I was briefly terrified last night after a certain bit of information was given. It’s entirely horrifying how easily this could actually happen.
And that’s the mark of a truly great horror movie. It’s legitimately horrifying to the viewer.