Category Archives: Not Sure

Marvin’s Room (1996)

Date Watched: August 20, 2011
Source: Netflix Instant Play

At first I didn’t want to watch this, because I’m not a huge fan of Diane Keaton. I love Meryl Streep though, so I watched it. Diane Keaton was as I expected her to be, but that worked here. Her care for her father and aunt was touching, and as much as I love Meryl, I don’t think she could have had the same effect in the role.

So anyway, I’m not totally sure about this. I feel like the movie was a little cliched. Chronic illness, familial dysfunction, troubled teen. Illness brings the family together. Definitely sort of typical. Yet, I still sort of liked it. I especially liked the scene when all of the pills are showered all over the floor. It was the very point when everyone crumbled at the same time. Very dramatic.

The only thing I can say for sure is that I’d probably need to see it again before I could really decide how I feel about it.


Queue it on Netflix

Leave a comment

Filed under Not Sure

Awful Normal (2004)

Date Watched: July 25, 2011
Source: Netflix Instant Play

This is a film about two sisters who were molested as little girls by their father’s best friend, who, with his wife, frequently vacationed with the family. Now, as adults, they are confronting their molester face-to-face. Along for the confrontation is the girls’ mother, who feels responsible for what happened. Their father has passed away several years ago. One sister didn’t get it as bad, and so she has a husband and children. The younger sister got it much worse, and now can’t trust men and is significantly more screwed up because of what happened. They start by meeting with the ex-wife and daughters of their attacker, who never knew what happened, and after they’re filled in, they support the endeavor. Then, the two sisters and mother have a therapy session to ready them. They write letters, choose a day, and go to his apartment. He’s not there, so they wait, and wait, go home, call him, and when he answers, they simply hang up and go back to the apartment. They confront him, words are exchanged, and then they leave, and it’s done. That’s the gist of it.

I don’t care a whole lot about spoilers in documentaries, which is good because documentaries are informational and therefore I have SOME OPINIONS ON SOME THINGS.

First: If you are going to confront the man who molested you as a child, who obviously has a sexual attraction to children, why in sweet mercy would you meet with him WEARING PIGTAILS?! Especially when you are the one who was abused the most? What are you doing, trying to bait him to do it again by making yourself look childish? IDIOT.

Second: I get that you were molested, and I get that it’s extremely traumatizing. But if you’re going to make a documentary about this whole confrontational, therapeutic process, try REALLY HARD to edit out most of your crying and whining. Watching the younger sister was very akin to being in a grocery store near a screaming, wailing child. Now, I am not downplaying what she’s going through. But we, the viewers, don’t need that. All it did was make her extremely annoying. Then she wore the pigtails to confront the guy and it was very hard to sympathize with her.

Third: Very early on in the film, the younger sister describes how everyone walked around naked in their house… which is not all that strange. Lots of families do that. Then, she says they showered with their father as little girls. Okay… that’s a little more strange, but I’m sure there are a bunch of families who are okay with that practice too. THEN, she ever so casually includes that they used to play with their father’s penis. Wait… what?? You… played with your father’s penis as a child? AND NOBODY THINKS THAT’S WRONG OR ABUSIVE?! ARE YOU KIDDING ME?!

Fourth: How in the love of bacon are you (here’s the completely moronic younger sister again) going to sit there, having a pleasant conversation with your attacker, then gang up on him with your sister and mother and rip him to shreds, ultimately asking him questions that really aren’t any of your business (like if there were others), and then stay by yourself again and finish off with more pleasant talk, laughing, and a HUG?? A FREAKIN’ HUG!! Really? REALLY??

Fifth: And after the pleasant talk, laughing, and the EVER-LOVING HUG, you proceed to go outside and wail again. For, like, minutes. Great… I get that. But EDIT. IT. OUT.

You know, I really have to say… if they had just made the documentary about the older sister, this would have been a heart-wrenching, empowering film. But because of the younger sister, it’s very hard to even care about what she’s going through. I’m not a calloused person, by any means. But you really need to know what you’re doing when you make a film like this. Excessive whining/crying/wailing and WEARING PIGTAILS and HUGGING YOUR ATTACKER.. gah!! It’s enough to make you want to throttle her through the screen.

Aaaaagh!


Queue it on Netflix

Leave a comment

Filed under Not Sure

The Hangover: Part II (2011)

Date Watched: May 28, 2011
Source: Theatre

I totally understand wanting to do another Hangover movie. The first one is easily one of the funniest movies I’ve ever seen. I swear, Ed Helms is a comic genius, and Zach Galifianakis howeveryouspellit was a damned riot.

But it just didn’t work. Come on guys… what are the chances of this happening again? The first time was understandable… they drank themselves stupid. This time, really? Really Allen? It’s not nearly as believable. It’s a stretch, it really really is. Stu’s tattoo isn’t nearly as hilarious as his missing tooth from the first one. In fact, nothing in here matches the first one, at all.

I wonder if this would have been funnier if it was the only Hangover that existed. It’s hard to say. You might love this if you haven’t seen the first one… but if you haven’t seen the first one, I’d say don’t watch this one. Watch the first. You can’t compete with comic perfection.

But I will say that Ken Jeong singing “Time In A Bottle” in the elevator was gold. I will definitely give them that much.


Queue it on Netflix

Leave a comment

Filed under Not Sure

The War of the Roses (1989)

Date Watched: March 26, 2011
Source: Netflix Instant Play

Eeehhh…

I don’t really like Kathleen Turner… and her character really made it especially difficult. Granted, he ignored her for a long time, or at least pushed her aside for his career. But he actually attempted to make things right. Even if it was too late, did she have to be such a bitch about it? No, I don’t think she did. And as far as the house goes, it was HIS money that bought the house. Who gives a crap if she picked it out and decorated it? He paid for it. Her decorations were purchased with his money.

And, I think it would’ve been a lot funnier if Danny DeVito was Oliver instead. Not saying anything negative about Kirk Douglas at all… he’s great. I think the comedic aspect would have been greater with DeVito though.


Queue it on Netflix

Leave a comment

Filed under Not Sure

RoboCop (1987)

Date Watched: March 5, 2011
Source: Netflix Instant Play

While I’m not sure how I feel about this — I definitely do not rate it up there with other 80s classics that I know and love — there were some memorable points:

1. “Bitches leave.”
2. *Bob Morton gets shot several times in the leg* “STOP IT!”
3. “come quietly or there will be… trouble.” “awwww… fuck you!”
4. When the giant shooter/walker thing falls down the stairs and squeals like a pig on the landing
5. *shoots giant gun* “I… LIKE IT!”
6. “Murphy! I’m a mess!”

But I think the best part about this movie is the fact that Dan O’Herlihy, better known as CONAL FREAKIN COCHRAN is in this movie!


Queue it on Netflix

Leave a comment

Filed under Not Sure

Before and After (1996)

Date Watched: January 8, 2011
Source: Netflix Instant Play

This is a side of Meryl Streep I haven’t seen before. She’s always a strong female lead, almost from the beginning. But here, it seems she’s a different kind of strong. Granted, I haven’t seen a lot of Meryl Streep films, so I’m not going to elaborate a whole lot. All I’m going to say on that is for a good part of the film, she seems weak. In the background. Not in control. And that’s very unlike what I’m used to.

Otherwise…

Edward Furlong. Again. I really don’t like Edward Furlong. I can’t say it enough. He always looks stoned. He’s totally the “Keanu Reeves” of every film he’s in; all his characters are the same (I don’t agree with that assessment of Keanu Reeves, but it’s a well-known point of contention with his roles so I used it).

All of that said, I think it could have been done better. I really don’t have much else aside from that. It was ho-hum.


Queue it on Netflix

Leave a comment

Filed under Not Sure

The Fast and the Furious: Tokyo Drift (2006)

Date Watched: December 26, 2010
Source: Netflix

On one hand, it wasn’t bad. On the other hand, it bears the “Fast and Furious” label. The first one happens to be one of my favorite movies. Apparently, one of my favorite things to do when I’m drunk is quote it line by line. This one just doesn’t have that for me. It doesn’t have any great lines worth remembering.

The drifting was awesome. Though, I do take issue with one scene where he’s in the car with the girl (I’m horrible with names) and she and a bunch of other cars are just peacefully drifting down this mountain road. Drifting is not peaceful. Sure, if you add dreamy music and show them all drifting at the same time, it looks that way. But if they’d had the real sounds in there, it’s loud as hell.

I don’t think I’d ever say “OOH I want to watch Tokyo Drift!” but I might sit and watch it if there was nothing better on. I’m a little conflicted on this.


Queue it on Netflix

Leave a comment

Filed under Not Sure

Paranormal Activity 2 (2010)

Date Watched: October 29, 2010
Source: Bootleg

Yes, this was a boot.

Yes, it was a bad boot.

Consequently, I missed a lot of the subtle things that Paranormal Activity is known for. I didn’t think it was right to skip over this since technically, I’ve seen it. But I didn’t really get the whole thing, and I will have to watch it again and do another post. But I will say that I’m pretty sure it was good. There was some seriously disturbing creepy stuff that I saw, and some that I couldn’t see but I’m pretty sure it was on par with what I did. So I will definitely be watching this again when it’s on DVD and reposting.


Queue it on Netflix

Leave a comment

Filed under Not Sure

Fair Haired Child (2006)

Date Watched: October 2, 2010
Source: Netflix Instant Play

I’m not sure how I feel about this. On one hand, I was pretty surprised (yet glad) when it was over after only 55ish minutes. But on the other hand, I think if they’d had more time to work with (this was a made-for-TV gem) and it had been a big screen movie, it could have been pretty good.

There are two things that make me say this. The first is the premise. The idea was pretty decent. Nice couple loses their teenage son in a freak accident on his fifteenth birthday. They resort to making a pact with evil to bring him back at an insanely high cost. Not to them, but it’s a freakin lot of work, that’s for sure. Anyway, the second reason is because the creature in this film (I was shocked to see that the image on the box art was actually the same as in the movie) is creepy as hell. I saw it… wasn’t expecting it because usually the art for horror movies is totally misleading and often much better than the movies… and I may have “eep!”ed. And when something makes me “eep!”, it’s usually at least a success. Possibly only a mild success, but a success none-the-less.

Not bad, I suppose. Though, I much prefer the Point Break or Free Willy or even “House M.D.” guest star appearance Lori Petty to this one. This one is… blah.


Queue it on Netflix

1 Comment

Filed under Not Sure

Sleepers (1996)

Date Watched: August 23, 2010
Source: Netflix Instant Play

This movie was so damned sad.

It was sad on two levels. The story itself was tragic and horrible and disturbing, and the ending was certainly depressing as hell (partial spoiler, maybe?) but the problem is that this could have been EXCELLENT. The story… everything is there. It has all it needs to really blow the viewer out of the water, and it just didn’t. I can’t really tell you why it didn’t, it just didn’t. DeNiro deserved a bigger part, I will say that much. Hands down, he’s excellent, but he’s too big for a relatively small part. Sure his character was the most important part of the ending, but still.

I’m fully acknowledging the poorness of this post. But without spoilers or any solid reason why it didn’t thrill me the way I think it had potential to, I don’t have a whole lot to say. Maybe I just need to watch it again.


Queue it on Netflix

Leave a comment

Filed under Not Sure